<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Out of the Shadows &#187; Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://outoftheshadows.ca/category/environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://outoftheshadows.ca</link>
	<description>Thoughts emerging from the quiet of the shadow become ideas, actions and opinion. Come, join my ramblings.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:13:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Eco Fees &#8212; A Cash Grab by Any Name</title>
		<link>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2010/07/08/eco-fees-a-cash-grab-by-any-name/</link>
		<comments>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2010/07/08/eco-fees-a-cash-grab-by-any-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PattiM</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mcguinty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provincial government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stewardship ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax dollars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste diversion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outoftheshadows.ca/?p=1170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Along with the HST coming into effect in July 1st, more Eco fees came into effect covering a wide range of products. The Eco fees are supposed to be fees charged to manufactures based on the amount of products or packaging they put into the market place.  Stewardship Ontario which receives these fees claims not [...]<p>Visit <a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca">Out of the Shadows - Thoughts emerging from the quiet of the shadow become ideas, actions and opinion. Come, join my ramblings.</a> </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Foutoftheshadows.ca%2F2010%2F07%2F08%2Feco-fees-a-cash-grab-by-any-name%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Foutoftheshadows.ca%2F2010%2F07%2F08%2Feco-fees-a-cash-grab-by-any-name%2F&amp;source=PattiM58&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Along with the HST coming into effect in July 1st, more Eco fees came into effect covering a wide range of products. The Eco fees are supposed to be fees charged to manufactures based on the amount of products or packaging they put into the market place.  <a href="http://www.stewardshipontario.ca/consumers/who-we-are/governance" target="_blank">Stewardship Ontario</a> which receives these fees claims not to be government yet they were setup by the provincial government.</p>
<p>If they are not government, then someone or some group is getting the money we are all being forced to pay. The manufactures are allowed to pass along the fees they are charged to the consumer in any manner they choose. At this point, the fees are appearing on our sales receipts as an added fee one which we pay &#8212; you guessed it &#8212; HST. But it&#8217;s not a tax you see, you just have to pay tax on it.</p>
<p>There appears to be no established standard as to how the fees are assessed and as such the consumer has zero protection from the manufacturers taking whatever they want as the cost of passing on the fee. Since it isn&#8217;t attached to the product at the point of the consumer making their selection, we don&#8217;t even have buying power to limit the fees to a minimum. <span id="more-1170"></span></p>
<p>There is no incentive for a manufacturer to absorb the costs into any part of their process or even to find cheaper ways to bring their product to market by keeping the eco fee to a minimum. Those products that are being charged the fees, oh yeah, you&#8217;re supposed to recycle them. While some retailers will be accepting some of those products, the vast majority of them will be recycled through municipal waste programs which, you guessed it, our tax dollars pay for.</p>
<p>Stewardship Ontario claims the new fees, along with those introduced in 2008 and since will &#8220;<em>helping ensure that these products are collected, recycled, reused or  disposed of in the most environmentally friendly way. And that’s good  for you, good for your families and good for the environment.</em>&#8221; Lots of luck with that boys.</p>
<p>If you think for even a moment that after paying this fee at the till I&#8217;m going to make sure the product ends up in a recycling depot, you have another think coming. Why would I pay for having to separate the items from my regular garbage (that I also pay to put out) and then transport it to a recycling depot when I&#8217;ve already paid a fee at the till?</p>
<p>They really want to ensure that more of these items are diverted from landfills, they need to do what beer and wine producers have done for years. Convert the Eco fee to an Eco deposit, with flat fees depending on the size of the items, which can be refunded when the products are brought to a recycling depot. That way, those who don&#8217;t recycle pay for the cost of running the program.</p>
<p>That would be too much like providing a real incentive and returning some of the cost of the effort to the consumer. Heaven forbid the taxpayer come out even when a cash grab is more fun.</p>
<p>This debacle was started by the Harris Conservative government and advanced under the McGuinty Liberals. This is one more nail in the Liberals coffin in Ontario. Since I wont vote for Hudak (Mike Harris lite) I may yet have to hold my nose and vote NDP in the next election.</p>
<p>Visit <a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca">Out of the Shadows - Thoughts emerging from the quiet of the shadow become ideas, actions and opinion. Come, join my ramblings.</a> </p>

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca/2010/03/18/playing-games-with-democracy/" title="Playing Games With Democracy (3/18/2010)">Playing Games With Democracy</a> (4)</li>
	<li><a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca/2008/10/06/one-week-left-in-election-campaign/" title="One Week Left in Election Campaign (10/6/2008)">One Week Left in Election Campaign</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca/2009/02/27/ok-who-let-the-other-harper-out-of-his-cage/" title="OK, Who Let the Other Harper Out of His Cage? (2/27/2009)">OK, Who Let the Other Harper Out of His Cage?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca/2008/04/01/mounties-influenced-2006-election-legally/" title="Mounties Influenced 2006 Election &#8212; Legally (4/1/2008)">Mounties Influenced 2006 Election &#8212; Legally</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca/2008/10/10/harpers-election-to-lose/" title="Harper&#8217;s Election to Lose (10/10/2008)">Harper&#8217;s Election to Lose</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2010/07/08/eco-fees-a-cash-grab-by-any-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Will Revenue Override Prudence?</title>
		<link>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2010/04/19/when-will-revenue-override-prudence/</link>
		<comments>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2010/04/19/when-will-revenue-override-prudence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PattiM</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air traffic controllers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eastern us seaboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iceland volcano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newfoundland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test flights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travellers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volcanic ash cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather forecasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather patterns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outoftheshadows.ca/?p=1090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the volcano in Iceland continues to spew forth ash and the cloud continues to spread itself across Europe and now apparently to the eastern shores of North America I&#8217;ve wondered how long the airlines would be tolerant of the prudence being shown by the air traffic controllers. I&#8217;m going to say at the outset, [...]<p>Visit <a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca">Out of the Shadows - Thoughts emerging from the quiet of the shadow become ideas, actions and opinion. Come, join my ramblings.</a> </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Foutoftheshadows.ca%2F2010%2F04%2F19%2Fwhen-will-revenue-override-prudence%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Foutoftheshadows.ca%2F2010%2F04%2F19%2Fwhen-will-revenue-override-prudence%2F&amp;source=PattiM58&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>As the volcano in Iceland continues to spew forth ash and the cloud continues to spread itself across Europe and now apparently to the eastern shores of North America I&#8217;ve wondered how long the airlines would be tolerant of the prudence being shown by the air traffic controllers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to say at the outset, I have never flown on an aircraft and at this point in my life have never had a need to. I have on occasion turned my vehicle into a flying vehicle due to lead footitis but I&#8217;ve never left the ground.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure millions of travellers stuck in countries they are trying to leave would certainly like to see planes flying to get them home. Over the weekend some European airlines sent up test flights through the volcanic ash cloud. At this point, they seem to be claiming their planes returned without any problems or damage.</p>
<p>Affected airlines are losing millions of dollars a day as this situation continues to drag on. Weather forecasters are now saying this will likely continue for days at a minimum and possible weeks depending on how long it takes this volcano to settle down. Meanwhile a NATO F-16 who flew through the cloud area reportedly has sustained damage to its engines. <span id="more-1090"></span></p>
<p>From the material I&#8217;ve read, most volcanoes initial eruption sends ash cloud into the air and then it settles as the volcano sends out molten lava. The Iceland volcano is erupting within a ice-field which means that the lava is being cooled by the ice which it hasn&#8217;t been able to instantly melt, this sends more and more ash cloud into the sky.</p>
<p>Weather patterns, not just winds, move the cloud around. Right now a high pressure system extending from Newfoundland to Iceland is pulling cloud from Iceland towards Canadian shores as it turns in a clockwise pattern. Two low pressure systems are sitting just below that high pressure and are moving counterclockwise. At least one of those lows will pull some of the cloud out of the high and down the eastern US seaboard.</p>
<p>And we thought there was chaos happening in Europe.</p>
<p>It appears that winds and weather patterns are capable of moving this grit filled cloud farther and faster than expected just as airlines are getting really anxious about the millions they are losing.</p>
<p>Were their test flights successful or are they wilfully overlooking effects which could potentially have devastating effects on planes making their way through the skies? Will world governments give into pressure from airlines and stranded passengers to get them to their destinations?</p>
<p>Even more frightening will be the prospect of planes full of hundreds of passengers at a time playing Russian roulette in the name of world commerce. Mother nature has a devastating way of showing us just who is in control doesn&#8217;t she?</p>
<p>Visit <a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca">Out of the Shadows - Thoughts emerging from the quiet of the shadow become ideas, actions and opinion. Come, join my ramblings.</a> </p>

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca/2008/02/02/taliban-jack-wants-to-bolt-from-kandahar/" title="Taliban Jack Wants to Bolt From Kandahar (2/2/2008)">Taliban Jack Wants to Bolt From Kandahar</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca/2009/02/04/ignatieff-allows-protest-vote/" title="Ignatieff Allows Protest Vote (2/4/2009)">Ignatieff Allows Protest Vote</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca/2009/03/23/gutfeld-goes-too-far-on-fox-news/" title="Gutfeld Goes Too Far On Fox News (3/23/2009)">Gutfeld Goes Too Far On Fox News</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca/2009/05/08/deal-with-the-devil-collapses/" title="Deal With the Devil Collapses (5/8/2009)">Deal With the Devil Collapses</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca/2008/02/04/baby-steps-hopefully-forwarded/" title="Baby Steps &#8212; Hopefully Forwarded (2/4/2008)">Baby Steps &#8212; Hopefully Forwarded</a> (1)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2010/04/19/when-will-revenue-override-prudence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leave My Veggies Alone</title>
		<link>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2009/06/23/leave-my-veggies-alone/</link>
		<comments>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2009/06/23/leave-my-veggies-alone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PattiM</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outoftheshadows.ca/?p=876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Globe &#38; Mail is reporting Monsanto &#38; Dole are wanting to tinker with vegetables, and are undertaking a five year project to do so. The objective is to “improve the nutrition, flavour, colour, texture and aroma of these vegetables,” the companies said. Leave my veggies alone dudes! When is governments going to wake up [...]<p>Visit <a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca">Out of the Shadows - Thoughts emerging from the quiet of the shadow become ideas, actions and opinion. Come, join my ramblings.</a> </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Foutoftheshadows.ca%2F2009%2F06%2F23%2Fleave-my-veggies-alone%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Foutoftheshadows.ca%2F2009%2F06%2F23%2Fleave-my-veggies-alone%2F&amp;source=PattiM58&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>The <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/no-dessert-mom-just-more-veggies/article1194172/" target="_blank">Globe &amp; Mail is reporting Monsanto &amp; Dole</a> are wanting to tinker with vegetables, and are undertaking a five year project to do so. The objective is to “improve the nutrition, flavour, colour, texture and aroma of these vegetables,” the companies said.</p>
<p>Leave my veggies alone dudes! When is governments going to wake up to the fact that genetically and chemically messing with our food supply is not only killing our environment but it is killing us? Literally.</p>
<p>As long as huge firms like Monsanto and Dole are allowed to mess with our food, our ability to avoid their impact becomes increasingly imposible. Monsanto produces seeds, so growing your own vegetables to avoid the tinkered with versions will become increasingly impossible. <span id="more-876"></span></p>
<p>Farmers currently find themselves locked into buying cycles with Monsanto seeds which requires they buy seed from them each year as they have genetically modified the seeds to only grow for one season. In the past, when nature was allowed to actually function as it was created, one crop could be used to seed the next years crop. Not when Monsanto got through messing with them.</p>
<p>I do my best to avoid processed foods but with companies like these being allowed to tinker with even the most basic of foods like vegetables the ability to avoid the chemical and genetic tinkering diminishes exponentially.</p>
<p>What a screwed up mess!</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://blog.friendseat.com/monsanto-lobbying-efforts-pt-1/">Our Seeds Sleep With The Devil &#8211; Part 1</a> (friendseat.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://blog.friendseat.com/how-to-id-genetically-modified-food-at-the-supermarket/"> How To I.D. Genetically Modified Food at the Supermarket </a> (friendseat.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://thetruthwarblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/bill-to-outlaw-organic-farming-next.html" class="broken_link">A bill to outlaw organic farming next week?</a> (thetruthwarblog.blogspot.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://naturalbias.com/your-right-to-choose-healthy-food-is-at-stake-again/"> Your Right to Choose Healthy Food is at Stake &#8230; Again </a> (naturalbias.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/336b481a-1550-4a5b-b6da-ecc75882ef43/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=336b481a-1550-4a5b-b6da-ecc75882ef43" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
<p>Visit <a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca">Out of the Shadows - Thoughts emerging from the quiet of the shadow become ideas, actions and opinion. Come, join my ramblings.</a> </p>

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li>No related posts.</li>
	</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2009/06/23/leave-my-veggies-alone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ontarians to Experience Recycling Fees</title>
		<link>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2008/03/31/ontarians-to-experience-recycling-fees/</link>
		<comments>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2008/03/31/ontarians-to-experience-recycling-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PattiM</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user fees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outoftheshadows.ca/2008/03/31/ontarians-to-experience-recycling-fees/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Waste Diversion Ontario has come up with a plan that should see electronic waste diverted from landfills and into recycling programs. The plan comes with an estimated cost of about $62million which is expected to be financed through fees consumers would pay at the time of purchasing their electronics. Fees are also being suggested to [...]<p>Visit <a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca">Out of the Shadows - Thoughts emerging from the quiet of the shadow become ideas, actions and opinion. Come, join my ramblings.</a> </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Foutoftheshadows.ca%2F2008%2F03%2F31%2Fontarians-to-experience-recycling-fees%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Foutoftheshadows.ca%2F2008%2F03%2F31%2Fontarians-to-experience-recycling-fees%2F&amp;source=PattiM58&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Waste Diversion Ontario has come up with a plan that should see electronic <a href="http://www.thestar.com/News/Ontario/article/407477" target="_blank">waste diverted from landfills</a> and into recycling programs. The plan comes with an estimated cost of about $62million which is expected to be financed through fees consumers would pay at the time of purchasing their electronics.</p>
<p>Fees are also being suggested to fund the disposal of old vehicles tires. Although many retailers have been charging $5 / tire for disposal for many years now. Which begs the question, if the government hasn&#8217;t been collecting that $5 / tire, who has? If the government does actually impose a disposal fee for tires will retailers then be stopped from collecting the current fee in addition? <span id="more-519"></span></p>
<p>Although many will view this as imposing yet another tax on Ontarians, it is one that can be controlled. If you don&#8217;t want to pay it, then don&#8217;t buy the electronics. Although I can ill afford anyone else dipping into my pocket, at the same time, someone has to pay for the costs associated with environmentally safe disposal and why not me as a user?</p>
<p>The laptop I&#8217;m writing this post on would cost me an additional $2.14  under the current proposal. That is not a huge price to pay to move my old piece of equipment into a recycling program. I&#8217;d rather see consumer goods being able to be broke down and some parts remanufactured than them filling our landfills with their often deadly toxins.</p>
<p>Visit <a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca">Out of the Shadows - Thoughts emerging from the quiet of the shadow become ideas, actions and opinion. Come, join my ramblings.</a> </p>

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca/2008/03/24/flaherty-needs-to-shut-up/" title="Flaherty Needs to Shut Up (3/24/2008)">Flaherty Needs to Shut Up</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca/2008/05/05/enbridge-breaks-law-customers-pay/" title="Enbridge Breaks Law, Customers Pay (5/5/2008)">Enbridge Breaks Law, Customers Pay</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca/2008/06/17/one-ban-i-agree-with/" title="One Ban I Agree With (6/17/2008)">One Ban I Agree With</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca/2009/09/29/letter-to-ignatieff/" title="Letter to Ignatieff (9/29/2009)">Letter to Ignatieff</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca/2008/03/28/harper-moves-to-reconcile-tory-blats-from-the-sidelines/" title="Harper Moves to Reconcile, Tory Blats From the Sidelines (3/28/2008)">Harper Moves to Reconcile, Tory Blats From the Sidelines</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2008/03/31/ontarians-to-experience-recycling-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smog Has a Hundred Year Old History</title>
		<link>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2007/06/10/smog-has-a-hundred-year-old-history/</link>
		<comments>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2007/06/10/smog-has-a-hundred-year-old-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PattiM</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outoftheshadows.ca/2007/06/10/smog-has-a-hundred-year-old-history/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most Canadians would think of smog and smog days as something that originated in the late 20th century. In fact, the term &#8216;smog&#8217; was coined back in 1905. Back then Dr. Henry Antoine Des Voeux delivered a paper to the Public Health Congress in London, England about the air in London. He noted there was [...]<p>Visit <a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca">Out of the Shadows - Thoughts emerging from the quiet of the shadow become ideas, actions and opinion. Come, join my ramblings.</a> </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Foutoftheshadows.ca%2F2007%2F06%2F10%2Fsmog-has-a-hundred-year-old-history%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Foutoftheshadows.ca%2F2007%2F06%2F10%2Fsmog-has-a-hundred-year-old-history%2F&amp;source=PattiM58&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Most Canadians would think of smog and smog days as something that originated in the late 20th century. <a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/article/223619" title="Dr. Des Voeux and the invention of smog" target="_blank">In fact, the term &#8216;smog&#8217; was coined back in 1905</a>. Back then Dr. Henry Antoine Des Voeux delivered a paper to the Public Health Congress in London, England about the air in London. He noted there was a health threat inherent in urban living due to the pervasive presence of a &#8220;smokey fog&#8221; or &#8220;smog&#8221;.</p>
<p>In this country concerns were being raised about smog in 1946 during the debate over the building of the Spadina Expressway in Toronto. They even started a committee to investigate the long term of effects from smog in the preceding two years.  A report in the Toronto Star said, &#8220;Toronto&#8217;s struggle with smoke-laden air will apparently continue for some time&#8221; It noted that the study group was planning to implement &#8220;public education&#8221; – &#8220;an admittedly slower way of addressing the problem,&#8221; it added.<span id="more-375"></span></p>
<p>Little did those forming the committee and the author of the Toronto Star report know just how slow that &#8220;public education&#8221; would be. The smog that covers much of the province, city and rural, these days has a different chemical makeup but is no less lethal. The way scientists squabble and politicians fiddle over the issue these days, I wonder how much truly will change in the next 50 years.</p>
<p>Visit <a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca">Out of the Shadows - Thoughts emerging from the quiet of the shadow become ideas, actions and opinion. Come, join my ramblings.</a> </p>

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li>No related posts.</li>
	</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2007/06/10/smog-has-a-hundred-year-old-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the Conservatives Obey New Law?</title>
		<link>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2007/02/15/will-the-conservatives-obey-new-law/</link>
		<comments>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2007/02/15/will-the-conservatives-obey-new-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PattiM</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canadian Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outoftheshadows.ca/2007/02/15/will-the-conservatives-obey-new-law/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears the party who ran on a platform of &#8216;law and order&#8217; and &#8216;those who obey the rules benefit&#8217; are about to have their standards tested. The House of Commons yesterday passed a law compelling the government (aka the Conservatives at the moment) to honour Canada&#8217;s commitment to Kyoto. The bill passed yesterday has [...]<p>Visit <a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca">Out of the Shadows - Thoughts emerging from the quiet of the shadow become ideas, actions and opinion. Come, join my ramblings.</a> </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Foutoftheshadows.ca%2F2007%2F02%2F15%2Fwill-the-conservatives-obey-new-law%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Foutoftheshadows.ca%2F2007%2F02%2F15%2Fwill-the-conservatives-obey-new-law%2F&amp;source=PattiM58&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>It appears the party who ran on a platform of &#8216;law and order&#8217; and &#8216;those who obey the rules benefit&#8217; are about to have their standards tested. The House of Commons yesterday <a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/article/182024" title="Honour Kyoto, House tells PM" target="_blank">passed a law</a> compelling the government (aka the Conservatives at the moment) to honour Canada&#8217;s commitment to Kyoto. The bill passed yesterday has to yet pass the Senate which is predominantly Liberal and as such will likely pass it fairly quickly.  </p>
<p>Visit <a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca">Out of the Shadows - Thoughts emerging from the quiet of the shadow become ideas, actions and opinion. Come, join my ramblings.</a> </p>

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li>No related posts.</li>
	</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2007/02/15/will-the-conservatives-obey-new-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tories Engage in Shell Game</title>
		<link>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2007/01/20/tories-engage-in-shell-game/</link>
		<comments>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2007/01/20/tories-engage-in-shell-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 19:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PattiM</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canadian Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outoftheshadows.ca/2007/01/20/tories-engage-in-shell-game/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So let&#8217;s see, last year (and it is a year ago) the Tories came to power with a minority government. Not long afterwards they quietly killed about 100 environmental programs that the Liberals had put into place. Some hadn&#8217;t yet kicked in some were running rather well. They also made it pretty clear they have [...]<p>Visit <a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca">Out of the Shadows - Thoughts emerging from the quiet of the shadow become ideas, actions and opinion. Come, join my ramblings.</a> </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Foutoftheshadows.ca%2F2007%2F01%2F20%2Ftories-engage-in-shell-game%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Foutoftheshadows.ca%2F2007%2F01%2F20%2Ftories-engage-in-shell-game%2F&amp;source=PattiM58&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>So let&#8217;s see, last year (and it is a year ago) the Tories came to power with a minority government. Not long afterwards they quietly killed about 100 environmental programs that the Liberals had put into place. Some hadn&#8217;t yet kicked in some were running rather well. They also made it pretty clear they have no intention of honouring the Kyoto accord to which we signed on.</p>
<p>Visit <a href="http://outoftheshadows.ca">Out of the Shadows - Thoughts emerging from the quiet of the shadow become ideas, actions and opinion. Come, join my ramblings.</a> </p>

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li>No related posts.</li>
	</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outoftheshadows.ca/2007/01/20/tories-engage-in-shell-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
